It is at the core of proper scholarly publishing and takes place in all respected scientific journals; accordingly, our referees have an important role to play in keeping the Journal's high standards and every manuscript is subjected to peer review in accordance with the procedure set out below.
Initial manuscript evaluation
The Editor begins by looking at all the manuscripts; although this is rare, it is entirely possible for a really good manuscript to be accepted right then. Manuscripts that satisfy the basic requirements are sent on to at least two experts to review them, and the authors of those manuscripts which are rejected at this stage will be notified.
Type of Peer Review
Manuscripts proceeding to peer review are evaluated by members of an international panel of experts. Each paper is subject to double-blind peer review by two or more independent reviewers, under the supervision of the section editor and the Editor-in-Chief. While the journal makes every effort to ensure that authors’ identities remain anonymous during the review process, authors themselves bear responsibility for concealing identifying details (e.g., in references to prior publications). If a manuscript contains information that reveals author identity, the review will be conducted in a single-blind format, meaning that reviewers remain anonymous but authors do not.
The journal strives to complete the peer review process within four weeks of the decision to review, although occasional delays may occur. Authors are advised to allow up to 7 weeks from the date of submission before contacting the editorial office. The Editor-in-Chief retains full authority over the final decision on acceptance or rejection.
How the reviewer is selected
Reviewers are assigned to the papers on the basis of their expertise. Although the authors are welcome to suggest reviewers, the organisers may choose to accept or reject these suggestions.
Reviewer reports
Reviewers are asked to evaluate and select one option:
• Accept Submission.
• Revision Required.
• Resubmit for Review.
• Resubmit Elsewhere.
• Decline Submission.
• See Comments.
Reviewers are not required to carry out corrections or proofread the manuscripts. Editing the language is not included in the peer review process.
Final report
The author will receive from the editors a final decision regarding whether or not to accept the manuscript together with any suggestions made by the reviewers, and this may also include strict comments from the reviewers.
Editor’s Decision is final
The reviewers recommend that the editor, who is in charge of making the final decision on whether or not to accept the article, should take this advice.
Publication Process
The publication process involves the following steps, the aim of which is quality.
Upon receiving the manuscript we will send the author an email confirming the submission.
The manuscripts will be tested using plagiarism checker software.
The editor will check the primary quality.
The manuscript will be submitted for double-blind review.
The editor will make the decision following the double-blind review and will then communicate it to the author. The decision can be one of three types: accepted without revision, resubmitted with major/minor revisions, or rejected.
Locke's Essay Concerning Human Understanding treats words as outward marks of inner ideas. That position seems to imply that language is private. Wittgenstein's private language argument in the Philosophical Investigations challenges the implication at its root. This paper looks at the tension inside Locke's theory of meaning and at Cook's reading of Wittgenstein, with recent scholarship in view. Locke's ideational theory faces a structural conflict. It holds that thought is unknowable, and it also holds that words express ideas. Wittgenstein's treatment of private language is better understood as a grammatical investigation than as a single argument. Its aim is to dissolve the temptation to treat sensations as private objects. Ying Li's recent work (2024) shows that Locke is not the private-language theorist he is often taken to be: the meaning of words is settled by public use. Recent research tends to read the private language argument as a grammatical therapy for the urge to privatize thought, not as an empirical thesis about language.
The private language problem has long held a central place in the philosophy of language. It does so in part because two difficult questions meet there: what role sensations play in meaning, and what it is to follow a rule. Locke's Essay Concerning Human Understanding already contains a tacit argument for the privacy of language. Wittgenstein, in the Philosophical Investigations, turns that argument into a series of thought experiments whose method is grammatical rather than demonstrative. This paper sets aside the attempt at another comprehensive reading. It asks two narrower questions. Can the meaning of sensation words rest on private objects? Is a private rule possible once public criteria of correctness are removed? Ayer, Cook, and Kripke give different answers. Drawing on recent scholarship, we argue that Wittgenstein's work is closer to therapy than to refutation, and that Kripke's rule-skepticism, while philosophically powerful, marks a hermeneutic shift. The most important step in the argument, on this reading, is the treatment of privacy claims as meaningless grammatical propositions.
Catholic religious music plays an important role in Christian worship and spiritual formation in Rwanda, where biblical faith is expressed through local languages, cultural values, and musical traditions. This study, entitled From Biblical Psalms to Catholic Religious Songs: Exploring the Role of Catholic Religious Music in Christian Spiritual Growth in Rwanda, examines the relationship between the biblical Psalms and Catholic religious songs and their contribution to Christian spiritual growth. The study asks: How does Catholic religious music contribute to prayer, faith formation, personal conversion, Christian identity, and participation in communal worship? It hypothesizes that Catholic religious music enhances Christian spiritual growth when its biblical and theological content is faithfully expressed through culturally meaningful forms. The objective is to examine this relationship and assess the role of Catholic religious music in Christian formation and evangelization. A descriptive mixed-methods design was employed among 70 undergraduate students of the Faculty of Theology at the Catholic University of Rwanda (CUR). Data were collected through structured questionnaires and analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. Findings indicate that 95.7% of respondents viewed religious music as an aid to prayer, 94.3% associated it with spiritual growth, 92.9% emphasized biblical foundations, 91.4% perceived it as effective for faith formation, and 90.0% reported increased participation in communal worship. The study concludes that Catholic religious music is a valuable instrument of Christian formation and evangelization.
This research shows practical classroom strategies offered by teachers for English teaching within secondary settings of education in Pietermaritzburg, South Africa. The research utilized a qualitative method. Exclude the implementation of different language laws; teachers frequently encounter instructional hurdles when assisting comprehensive language acquisition among multilingual students. To investigate these dynamics, the research involved 30 participants who answered semi-structured interview questions, which provided insights into these dynamics. The research involved 30 participants who answered semi-structured interview questions, providing insights into daily pedagogical sessions, interactive instructional skills, and curriculum delivery mechanisms. The taken data is made using NVivo software to systematically organize the transcripts of qualitative data, recognise recurring conceptual patterns, and manufacture robust thematic codes. The information shows the critical requirement for situation-responsive pedagogical frameworks, aimed literacy assist systems, and enhanced instructional engagement to optimize language results. This research leads to actionable insights for refining classroom methodologies and elevating overall educational levels in linguistically diverse places, offering a comprehensive start for the coming curriculum improvement and professional education practice across similar educational landscapes.
This study examines how Japanese literature was made readable and circulable in Maoist China through paratextual framing. Drawing on publication notes, prefaces, translators’ afterwords, editors’ notes, critical commentaries, circulation labels, and materials from the translated literature journal Zhaiyi, it argues that paratexts were not peripheral additions to translated works, but a central mechanism through which foreign literature was interpreted and managed. The analysis shows that these paratexts worked through repeatable routines of classification, warning, circulation control, and attribution. They classified authors and works before reading, warned against politically inappropriate interpretations, limited readership through internal circulation, and weakened individual translator identity through collective, pen-name, or absent attribution. In the case of Japanese literature, paratexts also produced a manageable image of Japan by narrating Japanese society as a site of capitalist crisis, framing literary value through a worker-peasant-soldier subject position, and arranging cultural knowledge through lists and columns. The article shows that translation during the Cultural Revolution was a language-ideological and cultural-political practice, through which foreign texts were turned into controlled objects of knowledge within a supervised system of publication and reading.