Diabetic Foot Ulcers in the Era of Antimicrobial Resistance: Biofilms, Stewardship, and Therapeutic Potential of Azadirachta indica and Moringa oleifera
Diabetic foot ulcers
(DFUs) are among the most debilitating complications of diabetes mellitus and
are associated with recurrent infection, prolonged hospitalization, lower-limb
amputation, substantial healthcare expenditure, and increased mortality. Their
management is increasingly complicated by polymicrobial infection, microbial
biofilm formation, and the emergence of multidrug-resistant organisms,
including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing
Enterobacterales, carbapenem-resistant organisms, and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biofilm formation further promotes chronicity
by limiting antimicrobial penetration, facilitating bacterial persistence and
horizontal gene transfer, and protecting microorganisms from host immune
responses. These challenges underscore the importance of antimicrobial
stewardship, including appropriate wound sampling, culture-directed treatment,
de-escalation of broad-spectrum antibiotics, avoidance of antimicrobial therapy
in clinically uninfected ulcers, and optimization of treatment duration. This
review synthesizes current evidence on the pathogenesis and microbiology of
DFUs, mechanisms of biofilm-associated antimicrobial resistance, antimicrobial
stewardship strategies, and the potential role of medicinal plants as
complementary wound-management agents. Particular attention is given to Azadirachta indica (neem) and Moringa oleifera, whose phytochemical constituents demonstrate antimicrobial,
antibiofilm, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and wound-healing activities. Neem
may inhibit bacterial adhesion, quorum sensing, efflux mechanisms, and biofilm
development, while moringa-derived compounds may disrupt microbial membranes,
inhibit bacterial enzymes and biofilm formation, and promote tissue
regeneration. Despite promising experimental evidence, clinical translation
remains constrained by limited standardization of plant extracts, insufficient
topical safety data, variability in extraction methods and concentrations, and
a paucity of rigorous clinical trials in patients with DFUs. Neem and moringa
therefore represent promising adjunctive candidates rather than established
replacements for conventional DFU management. Future research should prioritize
standardized formulations, toxicity assessment, mechanistic antibiofilm
studies, dose optimization, and well-designed clinical trials to establish
their efficacy and safety.
